{"id":175,"date":"2018-01-31T11:05:43","date_gmt":"2018-01-31T11:05:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/morph.surrey.ac.uk\/?p=175"},"modified":"2018-01-31T11:05:43","modified_gmt":"2018-01-31T11:05:43","slug":"what-happened-to-whom-and-why","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/morph.surrey.ac.uk\/index.php\/2018\/01\/31\/what-happened-to-whom-and-why\/","title":{"rendered":"What happened to whom (and why)?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>Wh-<\/em> words like <em>which, whom <\/em>and <em>why<\/em> get a lot of knickers in a twist, as attested by <a href=\"http:\/\/theoatmeal.com\/comics\/who_vs_whom\">this oatmeal comic<\/a> on when to use <em>who<\/em> vs <em>whom<\/em>, or the age-old debate about the correct use of <em>which <\/em>vs <em>that <\/em>(on which see <a href=\"http:\/\/www.chronicle.com\/blogs\/linguafranca\/2012\/12\/07\/a-rule-which-will-live-in-infamy\/\">this blog post<\/a> by Geoffrey Pullum). But in Old English the <em>wh-<\/em> words formed a complete and regular system which would have been easy to get the hang of. They were used strictly as interrogative pronouns \u2013\u00a0words that we use for asking questions like <em>who ate all the pies?<\/em> \u2013 rather than relative pronouns, which give extra information about an item in the sentence (<em>Jane, who ate all the pies, is a prolific blogger<\/em>) or narrow down the reference of a noun (<em>women who eat pies are prolific bloggers<\/em>). They developed their modern relative use in Middle English, via reinterpretation of indirect questions \u2013\u00a0in other words, sentences like <em>she asked who ate all the pies<\/em>, containing the question <em>who ate all the pies?<\/em>, served as the template for new sentences like <em>she knew who ate all the pies<\/em>, where <em>who<\/em> functions as a relative.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_177\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-177\" style=\"width: 512px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-177 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/morph.surrey.ac.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/Pie_eating_contest_bathing_beach.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"512\" height=\"378\" srcset=\"https:\/\/morph.surrey.ac.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/Pie_eating_contest_bathing_beach.jpg 512w, https:\/\/morph.surrey.ac.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/Pie_eating_contest_bathing_beach-300x221.jpg 300w, https:\/\/morph.surrey.ac.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/Pie_eating_contest_bathing_beach-366x270.jpg 366w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 512px) 100vw, 512px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-177\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Who ate all the pies? They did.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Originally, the new relative pronoun <em>whom<\/em> (in its Middle English form <em>hw\u0101m<\/em>) functioned as the dative case form of <em>who, <\/em>used when the person in question is the indirect object of a verb or after prepositions like <em>for<\/em>. For direct objects, the accusative form <em>hwone<\/em> was used instead. So to early Middle English ears, <em>the man for whom I baked a pie<\/em> would be fine, while <em>the man whom I baked in a pie <\/em>would be objectionable (on grammatical as well as ethical grounds). Because nouns also had distinct nominative, dative and accusative forms, the <em>wh- <\/em>words would have posed no special difficulty for speakers. But as English lost distinct case forms for nouns, the pronoun system was also simplified, and the originally dative forms started to replace accusative forms, just as <em>who<\/em> is now replacing <em>whom<\/em>. This created a two-way opposition between subject and non-subject which is best preserved in our system of personal pronouns: we say <em>he\/she\/they baked a pie<\/em>, but <em>I baked him\/her\/them<\/em> <em>(in) a pie.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Thus <em>hwone<\/em> disappeared the way of <em>hine<\/em>, the old accusative form of <em>he<\/em>. Without the support of a fully-functioning case system in the nouns, other case forms of pronouns were reinterpreted. Genitive pronouns like <em>my <\/em>and <em>his<\/em> were transformed into possessive adjectives (<em>his pie <\/em>is equivalent to <em>the pie of him, <\/em>but you can no longer say things like <em>I thought his<\/em> to mean \u2018I thought of him\u2019). The <em>wh-<\/em> words also used to have an instrumental case form, <em>hw\u0233, <\/em>meaning \u2018by\/through what?\u2019, which became an autonomous word <em>why<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Although <em>him <\/em>and <em>them<\/em> are still going strong, <em>whom<\/em> has been experiencing a steady decline. Defenders of \u2018whom\u2019 will tell you that the rule for deciding whether to use <em>who<\/em> or <em>whom <\/em>is exactly the same as that for <em>he <\/em>and <em>him<\/em>, but outside the most formal English, <em>whom<\/em> is now mainly confined to fixed phrases like \u2018to whom it may concern\u2019. For many speakers, though, it has swapped its syntactic function for a sociolinguistic one by becoming merely a \u2018posh\u2019 variant of <em>who<\/em>: in the words of James Harding, creator of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/groups\/2261517754\/\">\u2018Whom\u2019 Appreciation Society<\/a>, \u201cthose who abandon \u2018whom\u2019 too soon will regret it when they next find themselves in need of sounding like a butler.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-178 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/morph.surrey.ac.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/whom.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"725\" height=\"242\" \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Wh- words like which, whom and why get a lot of knickers in a twist, as attested by this oatmeal comic on when to use who vs whom, or the age-old debate about the correct use of which vs that (on which see this blog post by Geoffrey Pullum). But in Old English the wh- words formed a complete and regular system which would have been easy to get the hang of. They were used strictly as interrogative pronouns \u2013\u00a0words&#8230;<\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more\"><a class=\"btn btn-default\" href=\"https:\/\/morph.surrey.ac.uk\/index.php\/2018\/01\/31\/what-happened-to-whom-and-why\/\"> Read More<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">  Read More<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,4,8,2,22,20],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-175","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-case","category-english","category-english-languages","category-morphology","category-prescriptivism","category-syntax"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/morph.surrey.ac.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/morph.surrey.ac.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/morph.surrey.ac.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/morph.surrey.ac.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/morph.surrey.ac.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=175"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/morph.surrey.ac.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":183,"href":"https:\/\/morph.surrey.ac.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175\/revisions\/183"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/morph.surrey.ac.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=175"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/morph.surrey.ac.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=175"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/morph.surrey.ac.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=175"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/morph.surrey.ac.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=175"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}